第二次来杭州，终于有机会能到西湖逛逛。。。
冬天，一片肃杀；西湖，波澜不惊~~
向前走，向后走。。。右边的mm不认识，左边的背影那么熟悉~~
最近一直在看相机，卡片机够时尚、轻便，但是在晚上的效果真是不咋的~~
蘇小小之墓，算是逛西湖的一个小惊喜~~闭上眼睛，实在想象不出古代名妓会是个什么样子。。。
虽然没有进去，但是酒吧的名字还真是让人难忘~~
杭州-西湖
To Regift or Not To Regift.../左手收礼，右手送出？
The Fine Lines of Regifting
A recent study determined that giving an unwanted gift you received to someone else (regifting) is not considered as unacceptable as in the past.
The market research company, Harris Interactive, surveyed 1,505 American adults and found over half the participants admitted to regifting and 78 percent felt regifting was okay most of the time.
Nancy Wong, a spokeswoman for Harris Interactive, told Reuters, she was surprised that so many surveyed would admit to regifting.
"It's not something I've thought about and when I saw that nearly half had done it -- 52 percent have regifted and or would regift -- it's quite a significant number," Wong said.Why Do People Regift?According to the study, 77 percent of those surveyed admitted to re-gifting because the item was better suited for the person who received it.
Nine percent admitted to doing it out of laziness and four percent said they regifted because they did not like the person who was getting the gift.
Regifting is not without its guidelines. Much has been written on the proper way to regift and what should and should not be wrapped back up and given away a second time. Here are the Do's and Do Not's for regifting that are most often listed.
A recent study determined that giving an unwanted gift you received to someone else (regifting) is not considered as unacceptable as in the past.
The market research company, Harris Interactive, surveyed 1,505 American adults and found over half the participants admitted to regifting and 78 percent felt regifting was okay most of the time.
Nancy Wong, a spokeswoman for Harris Interactive, told Reuters, she was surprised that so many surveyed would admit to regifting.
"It's not something I've thought about and when I saw that nearly half had done it -- 52 percent have regifted and or would regift -- it's quite a significant number," Wong said.Why Do People Regift?According to the study, 77 percent of those surveyed admitted to re-gifting because the item was better suited for the person who received it.
Nine percent admitted to doing it out of laziness and four percent said they regifted because they did not like the person who was getting the gift.
Regifting is not without its guidelines. Much has been written on the proper way to regift and what should and should not be wrapped back up and given away a second time. Here are the Do's and Do Not's for regifting that are most often listed.
What To Avoid When Regifting
Don't Regift the Gift Card
A gift card hidden in tissue in a gift box can easily get passed along in error. Take the item out of the old wrappings and start new.
A gift card hidden in tissue in a gift box can easily get passed along in error. Take the item out of the old wrappings and start new.
Don't Regift the Gift Wrappings
Everyone can tell when something has hung around in a gift box for a year. Cardboard gets soft and seems to absorb the odors of wherever it was stored and old gift wrap can be spotted just by the feel of it. When regifting, do not use recycled gift bags, paper or tissue. Throw it all out and buy new and take a little extra time to make the wrapping look fresh and attractive.
Everyone can tell when something has hung around in a gift box for a year. Cardboard gets soft and seems to absorb the odors of wherever it was stored and old gift wrap can be spotted just by the feel of it. When regifting, do not use recycled gift bags, paper or tissue. Throw it all out and buy new and take a little extra time to make the wrapping look fresh and attractive.
Don't Tell
People like to believe gifts they receive were chosen with thought and consideration. If you tell someone you are giving then the silk scarf your Aunt Jane gave you last year, what you are really saying is that you are giving them something you think it ugly or unuseful. The only time you would want to mention giving your gift to someone else is if it isn't presented as a 'gift' but rather as a give-away.
Don't Regift the Used or Slightly Used
There is a big difference between regifting an unused night light or one that you plugged in for two months and decided you no longer want. Remember - a regift is a new item you give to someone else. A hand-me-down is an item you've used and offer to someone else when you decide you no longer have use for it.
There is a big difference between regifting an unused night light or one that you plugged in for two months and decided you no longer want. Remember - a regift is a new item you give to someone else. A hand-me-down is an item you've used and offer to someone else when you decide you no longer have use for it.
Don't Forget Where the Gift Came From
Avoid giving a re-gift to family or friends of the person who originally gave the gift to you. If the regift is displayed, you risk getting caught for giving it away by the person who gave it to you. Keeping a list going of regifts with the name of who gave you the gift can help avoid people pointing fingers at your later.
Do Regift Nice Things
Often the items getting regifted are undesirable, such as the bird statue you saw at the drugstore for 75 percent off. Why pass it along? However, if you received a nice gift, such as a wonderful cookbook you already own, do regift it to someone who you know will enjoy it. The nicer the item, the more it makes sense to regift it rather than to let it crumble up in a cabinet along side the Men in Briefs calendar someone thought you'd get a chuckle over.
Often the items getting regifted are undesirable, such as the bird statue you saw at the drugstore for 75 percent off. Why pass it along? However, if you received a nice gift, such as a wonderful cookbook you already own, do regift it to someone who you know will enjoy it. The nicer the item, the more it makes sense to regift it rather than to let it crumble up in a cabinet along side the Men in Briefs calendar someone thought you'd get a chuckle over.
Do Regift Heirlooms
Perhaps 10 years ago Aunt Jane sent you 12 of her prized crystal water glasses but you already have plenty and the design conflicts with what you are already using. In fact, you have never used the glasses. Regifting the crystal to someone in the family who is just starting off makes sense. Yes, they are used and yes they could be considered hand-me-downs, but none the less the gift has both monetary and sentimental value.
Perhaps 10 years ago Aunt Jane sent you 12 of her prized crystal water glasses but you already have plenty and the design conflicts with what you are already using. In fact, you have never used the glasses. Regifting the crystal to someone in the family who is just starting off makes sense. Yes, they are used and yes they could be considered hand-me-downs, but none the less the gift has both monetary and sentimental value.
The Number One Rule to Regifting
Regifting is a wonderful way to save money and when done tactfully and with thought, we can accomplish the goal of why we are giving a gift to someone in the first place - because we want them to have something they will enjoy.
----From "about.com", a website with lots of living tips and wisdom^_^
国外粉丝“恶搞”MV之菁华——The Reason
Hoobstank 的The Reason 之MV对比版——我一直都觉得：Collin 和 Jared 联袂的MV更适合这首歌～
先来“本尊”^_^
再来某个不知是Collin Ferrell 还是Jared Leto 的粉丝整出来的“同志版”MV——据本人揣测，该MV的灵感应是来自于两位主演的一部叫《Highway》的影片。原来，众影迷/歌迷觉得Collin和Jared如此“般配”，并不仅仅出于那部毁大于赞的《亚历山大大帝》，还有这部国内名不见经传的《Highway》^_^
**再加一句：“同志版”MV里面的Jack Gyllenhaal那一头乱发，还有胖乎乎的脸，真是……咳……其实看起来还挺可爱的；后面插了一段《Sword Fish》里面Huge Jackman 拿鸡蛋当高尔夫球打的镜头——从没想过，原本影片里面无聊前卫的消遣在这段MV里看来居然显得落寞惆怅起来～～
押韵会
窗外寒风吹，网上押韵会。
最近日子琐碎，只是谈谈情跳跳舞犯犯醉。情人的温柔拒绝，有一种残酷的优美，如同冬夜寒意，突袭我的秋水。就算颓废炼成翡翠，也随月光夜夜破碎。能否借你冰心冷若星辉，照我情路绝路百折千回？
十月伤风向我猛吹，十一月蔷薇涌向你疏眉，十二月寂寞穿透我心肺，终于一句冬意将我击溃。蝴蝶扑过天涯的无畏，无力煽动落日的沉睡。你的微笑若是天使羽翼，可否领我灵魂越群星而高飞？
敢问大仙，这样混人生到底对不对？这样过日子是否太昂贵？这样付出感情，最后会不会导致心灵崩溃？
已知一寸相思一寸灰，莫问今夜情人归不归。
人生没有对不对，生活总是太昂贵；感情付出别后悔，心灵崩溃才不累。
押韵小文是挺美，就像喝酒有点醉；不愿相思来成灰，只盼情人今夜归。
飞机和传送带的问题
假设有一架飞机，停靠在一个传送带。传送带足够宽、足够长。飞机的滚轮开始滚动，而传送带以同样的速度朝相反方向滑动。那么，这架飞机能起飞吗？在办公室里不能锻炼身体，那么锻炼一下脑子吧。。。
Here's the original problem essentially as it was posed to us: "A plane is standing on a runway that can move (some sort of band conveyer). The plane moves in one direction, while the conveyer moves in the opposite direction. This conveyer has a control system that tracks the plane speed and tunes the speed of the conveyer to be exactly the same (but in the opposite direction). Can the plane take off?"
先看看老外怎么说：
Exactly what I was thinking. I wasnt even thinking about the wheels... just the fact the plane isn't really moving, therefore no lift force provided to make the plane actually go... up! An example would be like sitting on those gym bikes with no wheels. You can peddle as fast as you want, but you wont feel the fresh breeze of that speed. No breeze, no wind... no lift!我在想，如果飞机可以起飞，那么是不是机场就不用造那么多跑道了呢，有个200米的传送带就足够了，飞机几乎可以原地起飞！但是现在的问题是由于传送带向相反方向等速运转，飞机轮子产生的摩擦力被抵消，而显然这个飞机不是指直升机，螺旋桨在上，产生的气流向下。一般的民航客机要想平地起飞的话，也许条件必须是引擎产生的动力足够大,大到产生的气压差可以将飞机托起来。
Airspeed is the only thing that matters to an airplane. The speed of the wheels has nothing to do with anything. You need air flowing very quickly over the wings and tail to generate lift.The only time an airplane can take off from a very low groundspeed if it was facing into a very strong headwind. Some small planes have been know to hover relative to the ground if they are flying directly into a very strong wind.
。。。。。。
问题又绕回来了，在那种情况下，动力足够大是不是可以产生气压差呢?
要知道光是风大是没有用的，就算在风洞里面，最多也只是能够加快飞机轮子和传送带的速度而已！
Edvard Munch
今天一早打开IE，发现Google的Logo有点“彪悍”——居然是用“表现主义（Expressionism）之父”Edvard Munch的The Scream改编而来，亏他们想得到^_^ 不过可惜的是，原作据说已给某著名“雅贼”他老妈毁掉了-_-
记得前段时间Google还有一纪念“印象派（Impressionism）”大师Claude Monet的Logo，可惜找来找去没有找到2006年的，弄了张前年的凑合一下：
再顺手来个“后印象派”的凡.高(Vincent van Gogh)，Hia Hia……
面试
昨天下午溜出去面试，跟一老外面试官鬼扯了半天，终于决定放弃：
—I’m really sorry that my English is so poor -_-
哪知对面的面试官比我还要沮丧：
—At least your English is better than my Chinese. And you all can speak a second language here, but the only language I can speak is English……
这话实在得~~~~~真是中听啊^_^
Mcafee后台进程分析
用Mcafee杀毒软件又内存不足的朋友一定想知道Mcafee的那些后台进程到底是干嘛的，以下内容为转载：
UpdaterUI.exe：自动升级进程，处于注册表内，由于咖啡一个星期才升级一次我觉得完全没必要让他在内存里待着，去注册表里把启动项目KO就行了。当你升级的时候这个进程会自己启动的，升完了你再从任务管理器里的进程管理把它关了就OK
shstat.exe：也就是你系统栏里那个盾牌一样的图标，启动项处于注册表内，最好留着
Tbmon.exe：错误报告程序（我翻了80页的帖子才让我给查出来，置顶的经验帖子里居然没说，问了N多人都不知道，超FT），启动项处于注册表内，我完全想不通这东西有何存在的必要，特别是对于个人用户来说。去注册表里KO掉
Vstskmgr.exe（Network Associates Task Manager）：这个东西属于系统服务。到底是干什么用的我不大清楚，460个帖子里只有一个提到这个进程似乎和控制台有关。但有一点是肯定的，就是关 闭它对系统扫描查毒杀毒都没发现有影响，唯一需要它的地方就是当你开启咖啡的控制台的时候，如果此时你关闭了该服务，那么它会首先去启动这个服务，然后才 能打开控制台。所以我平时一般就把服务调整为手动，反正你要用控制台的时候他会自己去启动这个服务的，所以不用管。我是把这个服务给改成手动了的。平时不 启动，用完了就从任务管理器里停掉
Mcshield.exe：咖啡的核心，系统服务，不动为妙，
PS：有没有谁试验过看能不能从控制面板服务里把这个服务在运行的时候给关闭掉，卡巴的进程保护很厉害，从服务里在运行的时候是关不掉的，告诉你没权限。不知道咖啡的进程保护如何。
Frameworkservice.exe（McAfee Framework 服务，McAfee 产品的共享组件框架）：咖啡的后台框架进程，属于服务。平时关闭的话，经过我测试是不影响普通使用的，但是会影响升级，且这个进程和 Vstskmgr.exe不一样，他不能自动的去启动服务，如果你调整成手动，那么你非得自己动手去启动这个服务，才能运行升级程序，如果不在意麻烦的话 就改成手动算了，反正咖啡一个星期才升一次........
naPrdMgr.exe：这个进程以前的版本就有，不知道是什么东西，即不在注册表启动项里也不在服务里，翻完了600个帖子只有两篇文章很含糊 的提到说根据程序名字这似乎是用来传递某种信息的进程。这个进程通过我的试验只证明了一点，就是他是个Frameworkservice.exe在一起 的，如果Frameworkservice.exe被停止，则它绝对不会在任务管理器里出现。
如果不会修改注册表的朋友，点击开始菜单=>运行=>msconfig=>启动项，相应的取消选择即可。
BOM
BOM——Byte Order Mark，就是字节序标记。
另外unicode网站的FAQ-BOM详细介绍了BOM。在UCS 编码中有一个叫做"ZERO WIDTH NO-BREAK SPACE"的字符，它的编码是FEFF。而FFFE在UCS中是不存在的字符，所以不应该出现在实际传输中。UCS规范建议我们在传输字节流前，先传输 字符"ZERO WIDTH NO-BREAK SPACE"。这样如果接收者收到FEFF，就表明这个字节流是Big-Endian的；如果收到FFFE，就表明这个字节流是Little- Endian的。因此字符"ZERO WIDTH NO-BREAK SPACE"又被称作BOM。
UTF-8不需要BOM来表明字节顺序，但可以用BOM来表明编码方式。字符"ZERO WIDTH NO-BREAK SPACE"的UTF-8编码是EF BB BF。所以如果接收者收到以EF BB BF开头的字节流，就知道这是UTF-8编码了。
Windows就是使用BOM来标记文本文件的编码方式的。
最近在用Castor解析XML文件的时候被这个BOM搞死了，好像SAX解析就已经不认这个标识了，最后直接过滤删除BOM了事。
java.io.PushbackInputStream
java.io.PushbackInputStream可以实现向一个输入流添加“推回(push back)”或“取消读取(unread)”一个字节的功能。比如，我在过滤XML content prolog中的UTF-8的BOM(EF BB BF)的时候就很有用：
FileInputStream inputStream = new FileInputStream(xmlFile);注意：要在 PushbackInputStream 的构造方法上加上所读取/推送字节数组的大小（默认值为1）,如果不指定缓冲大小或大小小于字节数组的大小，当读取数据量多于缓冲大小时，再 unread 会抛出消息为 "Push back buffer is full" 的 java.io.Exception。
PushbackInputStream pis = new PushbackInputStream(inputStream,3);
byte[] buf = new byte[3];
pis.read(buf, 0, 3);
if (!((buf[0] == -17) && (buf[1] == -69) && (buf[2] == -65))) {
pis.unread(buf, 0, 3);
}
文青愤青，不过如此
昨天看某画报，发现以前在校读书时耳朵、眼睛经常给“轰炸”到的某著名经济学家仙去啦——其实一直以来，我都不知道那位尊敬的Gulu还活到了21世纪！
出于某种羞愧的心理，我决定上网查询一下那位“咕噜”的生平，在Google输入“弥尔顿.弗里德曼”跳出来的结果中有篇博客“第三个弗里德曼”吸引了我，点开一看，揣测作者是位牛人，所以顺便翻看了其中的一些文章，看到“文兼愤青的自白书”，对照着琢磨了一下，结论如下：
1，喜欢鲍勃·迪伦——没啥感觉，他关我什么事？
2，喜欢崔健——感觉一般般
3，喜欢罗大佑——感觉一般般
4，喜欢郑钧——好像没啥感觉
5，喜欢汪峰和鲍家街——有听过汪峰的歌，不错；鲍家街不知道是人名/地名/乐队名？
6，讨厌零点——还好
7，讨厌李宗盛——的确不是特别喜欢
8，讨厌四大天王——除了某个看起来特别拽的，其他基本都是好青年—》好中年
9，喜欢高晓松——还好
10，喜欢齐秦——还好，就是“痴”了点
11，喜欢Beyond——嗯，这个估计现在街头练摊的小弟、饭馆里跑堂的小厮……都爱听
12，喜欢胡吗个——这个，哈哈……
13，不喜欢张楚——难道是因为他给“招安”了？
14，喜欢窦唯——可能他太有才华、太前卫了，我还得好好培养自己的觉悟
15，喜欢唐朝——喜欢“唐”，因为那是我的姓氏，对乐队似乎没啥感觉
16，喜欢何勇——不认识，呵呵
17，喜欢许巍的前两张专辑，不喜欢后面的——听过的都不错，后面讨厌的还没听到
18，喜欢王菲——“间歇性”喜欢，^_^
19，喜欢Paul Simon——不是太熟啊……
20，喜欢Pink Floyd——嗯，挺有个性的
21，讨厌U2——他们招你惹你了？
22，喜欢Queen——嗯，不错……
23，喜欢Dire Straits——还没听说过……
24，喜欢Slash在时的GNR——GNR很好啊，有Slash当然更好，呵呵
25，喜欢Roxette——Roxette的确很好，不过多听了还是有点烦
26，喜欢Kurt Cobain——这么多人“死哈”他，是不是因为他英年早逝？
27，喜欢Eric Clapton——嗯，的确不错
28，喜欢Alicia Keys——不是很熟……喜欢她的身材还是嗓音？
29，喜欢Christina Aguilera——外貌看起来有些怪异……不过她怎么样跟我好像无关啊
30，喜欢Britney Spears——这个这个……嘿嘿……
31，讨厌Jessica Simpson——结合以上两条，得出结论：文兼愤青其实也很“大众”！
32，喜欢Alicia Sylverstone——还未了解过
33，喜欢以前的Natlie Portman，不喜欢现在的——以前、现在，都跟我无关
34，喜欢到《活着》为止的张艺谋，不喜欢其后的——他有拍片的自由，我们有选择进不进电影院的自由，^_^
35，喜欢贾樟柯——的确
36，喜欢鬼子来了之前的姜文，不喜欢鬼子来了之后的姜文——无所谓啦，他又不是我家表哥
37，喜欢Pulp Fiction——有待了解
38，喜欢Mel Brooks——有待了解
39，不喜欢Jim Carey——还好，最起码人家还是努力工作，努力生活的么
40，喜欢周星驰——其实不是跟Jim Carey差不多的德行嘛……
41，讨厌王晶——无所谓啦
42，喜欢冯小刚——哈哈
43，喜欢单田芳——似乎小P孩时代曾跟老爹一起听过……
44，喜欢克鲁伊夫——踢足球的啊……太多了
45，讨厌贝肯鲍尔——他哪里得罪你了？
46，喜欢马拉多纳——有个性，但似乎混得不是很好哇……
47，讨厌贝利——估计跟讨厌贝肯鲍尔是出于一样的理由
48，喜欢古力特——结合44条，有理由认为，原作者是荷兰球迷
49，喜欢金庸小说，不喜欢金庸其人——说这话，就好像理直气壮的说“我要家里有个老婆，外面有个情人”一样……为什么总是要搞这种“分裂”？
50，不喜欢章子怡——人家混到今天的地位也不容易
51，不喜欢成龙——这个超级同意，哈哈
52，喜欢李安——还好
53，喜欢王小波——似乎太招人喜欢总会“折寿”哇……
54，喜欢李银河——嗯？李银河是干什么的？
55，喜欢South Park——哈哈
56，喜欢Saturday Night Live——跟Saturday Night Fever有没有关系啊？
57，喜欢Jon Stewart——不是很熟……
58，喜欢Steve Colbert——有待了解
59，讨厌Bill O'Reilly——他是谁？他也惹着你了？
60，讨厌Jessie Jackson——女人……给人讨厌是很没面子的事啊……
61，讨厌George W Bush——估计全世界知道他的人有99.9％不喜欢他
62，讨厌Laura Bush——还好，你家有个女人能像她那样就该感恩了
63，讨厌John Kerry——政客总是不招人待见的
64，喜欢Teresa Henz Kerry——结合63条，加上Kerry夫人的巨额家产……真是耐人寻味啊
65，喜欢Bill Clinton——他的确很有魅力，哪怕喜欢沾花惹草
66，讨厌Hillary Clinton——这个这个……是不是因为她的野心？
67，喜欢Collin Powell——太懦弱了，而且立场不坚定，说到底还是“政客”一枚
68，喜欢John McCain——有待了解
69，不喜欢朱利安尼——纽约市长？
70，喜欢Wesley Clark——有待了解
71，不喜欢Howard Dean——有待了解
72，不喜欢Ted Kennedy——他又怎么着你了？
73，喜欢李洁明——不认识
74，喜欢汪曾祺——不认识
75，喜欢高尔泰——这个……高尔基＋伏尔泰么？
76，喜欢北岛——写诗的，不是很熟
77，讨厌二月河——是不是“文人相轻”？
78，讨厌海岩——是不是因为他靠文字赚的钱太多了？
79，喜欢布尔加科夫——不认识
80，喜欢博尔赫斯——不认识
81，喜欢加西亚·马尔克斯——不是很熟
82，不喜欢达芬奇密码——无谓喜不喜欢……怎么没提到《玫瑰的名字》？
83，不喜欢斯蒂芬·金——大多数作品是不咋滴，不过些作品的确不错
84，哦，狂喜欢Matrix，不喜欢Reloaded和Revolution——N多年前的了，怎么没提到《V for Vendetta》？
85，喜欢Lord of the Rings电影——嗯，估计有成为经典的可能
86，喜欢Aladdin——就是Aladdin神灯么？
87，喜欢停在一个随意的数字——在什么情况停顿？
综上得出：一向自视甚高的文青、愤青们也很大众，不客气一点，其实还是有些“俗气”；而且，那么多条参照标准，似乎跟我们中国本土文化很少有关系，大片大片的“参照物”来自国外（至不济也是来自港台），特别是那个给全世界人民深深鄙视的同时，又深深“眷恋”着的——美国！！难道一向以“有识之士”自居的文兼愤青其实都是进口原料喂养长大的？OMG!! 还有，身居前沿的文兼愤青们也太不“与时俱进”了一点……
那些参照标准的来源，多是影视作品、音像制品和书籍、报纸杂志的，Big Names都来自影视娱乐文艺界，且基本上都是近几十年来的所出，地域范围也不过美国＋大中国区……文兼愤青们的眼界原来也就这么一点点，今天我算是见识啦，一句话：“不学无术，我只懂装酷”！
What's WYSIWYG?
WYSIWYG
(what you see is what you get)
(名) 所见即所得, (计算机用语) 应用的特征 (档案在屏幕上出现的形式和将会被印出的形式完全一样)
n. characteristic of applications in which a document appears on-screen exactly as it will appear when printed (Computers)
靠，老外的造词能力再强，也不能随便找个句子就来首字母缩写吧？
订阅：
博文 (Atom)
